Figures of the case of the ex-head of the tax on the converter went to the deal
Four defendants in the criminal proceedings on suspicion of the former head of the State Tax Service Євгена Олейнікова of involvement in the criminal organization that created the conversion center with a turnover of 15 billion UAH, went to an agreement on the recognition of guilt.
This decision 5 October adopted ВАКС, reports «Слово і діло».
«1 жовтня 2026 року до Вищого антикорупційного суду надійшов вказаний обвинувальний акт з реєстром матеріалів досудового розслідування, розписками (Богомола Вадима Івановича, Єфімової Тетяни Михайлівни, Павловської Ганни Олегівни, Казаченка Євгена В'ячеславовича – ред.) та їхнього захисника про отримання копії обвинувального акту і реєстру матеріалів досудового розслідування у кримінальному провадженні та угоду про визнання винуватості», is the solution.
As you know, according to the investigation, the former prosecutor of Donetsk region Вадим Богомол was the organizer of the conversion center. Одночасно Ефімова served as the chief accountant of the conversion center, and Pavlovskaya was its assistant. Kazachenko was the head of one of the private companies.
Recall that НАБУ and САП exposed 11 individuals in participation in a criminal organization that created a conversion center with a turnover of 15 billion UAH. In particular, among the suspects is the former head of the State Tax Service Євген Олейніков. As the investigation established, he contributed to the unhindered operation of the conversion center, and his former deputy head of the company, who stopped the registration.
According to НАБУ, the organization’s members created a scheme of more than 200 legal entities to minimize tax payments. The center’s activities became possible due to the systematic abuse of ДПС officials and bribery of individual employees.
According to the case file, in 2020-2023, the center issued tax invoices with false data for a total amount of 15 billion UAH, the fictitious ПДВ amounted to more than 2,3 billion UAH. As a result of the procurement, the state budget did not receive more than 147 million UAH. Previously, the amount was lower than in this case.
